"Global
Opportunities: Weathering the Economic Storm"
By Di Landau, president,
Global Resources, Inc.
As the World Trade Towers fell last
September amid the constraints of an already declining economy,
one thing was immediately clear to me: Firms with a global market
strategy and operations
would weather the horrific economic
storm arising out of this tragedy far better than firms with centralized
U.S. assets and market presence.
The past year has brought tough challenges
across the board and, while going global is not right for every
organization, globalization remains a key tool for many firms
to weather the tough economic times of the U.S. and global economy.
Having spent time working in several countries and handling investment
concerns with many others since 9/11, Ive been both astounded
and fascinated by the No. 1 question Ive been asked when
overseas: "So, when is the U.S. economy going to get better so
ours will get better, too?"
Such questions remind me of the power, strength,
resilience and leading role we have played, and will continue
to play, as part of the world marketplace. Despite the current
recession, the World Economic Forum continues to rank the United
States as first in growth competitiveness. But the forces of technology
and globalization have dispersed power, and it is interesting
to consider how five other superpowers play leading worldwide
economic roles, both on their own and in partnership with U.S.
business interests.
China: Every decade has its
"most popular nation" award. In the 1980s it was India; in the
90s it was Japan. In the new millennium, of course, it is
China. It seems that every U.S. investor wants a piece of this
pie, despite the costly and consuming demands it takes to get
it. The economy is booming, with GDP growing at about 5 percent
per year; but never forget the enormous implementation challenges
this country faces in terms of infrastructure development and
distribution if it is going to carry even one-half of those 1.2
billion citizens to a higher standard of living. Long-term expenditures
for those national needs will clearly curtail the great investment
plans that are detailed for the excited and eager foreign investor.
In my visits to China in December 2001 and
June 2002, the only visible impact from 9/11 was in the diplomatic
circles; on the street and in meetings, the nation was far more
consumed with its Herculean task of preparing for the digital
Olympics and gaining technology assets for all sectors
particularly from the other superpowers, and especially the Japanese
and U.S. China
is a world power with sights set on world domination, but it will
take many decades before the nations economic, political
and financial systems will come together to realize its ideological
vision. In the meantime, do chase its markets theyre
huge and eager for your goods and services but remember
that partnership in China usually means, "What can you do for
me today?"
Japan: While Japan will never
have the size or scale of the United States, the worlds
second largest economy has figured out how its proximity to China
can provide both nations with the perfect match of technological
know-how and a large and eager labor force. The Japanese businessmen
and hotels dominating the Chinese landscape bring to mind the
great joke in India in the mid-1980s, as the nation opened its
borders to foreign investment. "Hey, do you know the first thing
an American does when he arrives in India (China)?" "He confirms
his return ticket home." "Do you know the first thing a Japanese
does when he arrives in China?" "Buys real estate." U.S. firms
have invested billions in this market, which is frank about its
desire to source indigenously; U.S. firms may be more effective
if they pursue their Japanese relationships as part of a broader
pan-Asian (China?) strategy.
Russia: Somehow, discussions
of Russia and the great possibilities that its open borders created
have fallen to fifth or sixth place on most U.S. firms investment
maps. Certainly the great gold rush rule has played out: Those
who knew how to play in this turbulent investment climate or had
the relationships to help them succeed won in the 90s as
borders opened, while many others who were new and ran blindly
and anxiously after the promised gold lost their shirts and went
home bankrupt. But this country with its direct manner,
vast natural resources, a skilled science and engineering base,
and key ties into Central Asia and Europe can be more familiar
to Americans than the better promoted Asian markets, and be accessed
and leveraged off of a firms regional operations and established
partnerships. But remember that Russias political and institutional
systems remain weak. Like China, Russia remains a long-term market
that should be explored while securing more immediate revenue
from established customer bases.
India: The great passion for
chasing India was spearheaded by Rajiv Gandhis liberalization
policies in the 80s and accelerated by important changes
in foreign investment laws in the90s. But what of India
today? The dominant news concerns its border issues with Pakistan,
but this situation is far removed from the economy, which has
been growing steadily, and the established information and technology
industries that are expanding into regional markets (including
China). Indias British-born infrastructure its common
commercial, legal and language ties to the U.S. remains
a primary motivator for why India should be on virtually every
U.S. firms international radar scope. The bureaucracy will
test any investors patience, but the institutional systems
are in place, rendering paper battles well worth the effort. With
a middle class that is about the size of the entire United States,
this materialistic society welcomes U.S. goods and services. Just
ensure that youve got your local partners to handle the
grueling day-to-day political and organizational wrangling, and
secure your investments through available commercial and political
insurance tools.
Europe: Given that the European
Union economy is about the size of the U.S. economy, with lifestyles
and spending patterns that are similar to ours, by now, any U.S.
firm offering products or services for a developed country environment
should have a presence in this world powerhouse. Europeans have
served as imperialists and traders far longer than the U.S., so
in addition to regional sales, partnerships with European companies
and countries provide U.S. firms with access into key markets
(e.g. consider Telefonicas dominance of the Latin American
telecommunications scene). Consider language and ethnic ties from
Europe and Turkey into the Baltic, Caucus, and Russian arenas,
and youve got a solid third of the worlds spending
power in your market scope.
It is no secret that current U.S. policies
and our administrations rhetoric raise important questions
about how well U.S. interests and investments will be received
as we move forward with the political and military challenges
9/11 generated, as well as the limitations of the global downturn.
But in the meantime, for those firms that are eager, ready and
capable to globalize, the need to get on a plane and visit your
partners and customers is more important than ever.
Di Landau is president of Global
Resources, Inc., a global telecommunications and information
technology consulting and training firm that is based in Irvine,
Calif., with offices in Bridgewater, N.J. and worldwide affiliates.
For information, call (949) 721-0323.